“For me, this piece is a lot about deconstructing our process of looking — each of us looking individually from our personal points of view, and also collectively, how our looking is constructed historically, socially, politically.” – Zoe Leonard
This makes me think of how we construct and build things from buildings, roads, and interior. I do agree to Zoe’s statement because I like to understand and look at other peoples points of view if I was drawing a sculpture from one side and someone behind me draws the same sculpture in front they may or may not have the same view point. Now how does this relate to the theme of our class in Core 2 well each student has there own personal selection compared to someone else or they may use the photos they gather differently even if they were the same photos as yours. Another way is that everyone was given a list of the same items to search or picture they will more than likely be different from another students and they may arrange it like yours or not but. But if they did or were to they may have a different view point or different way they got to their subject. This is not at all surprising I am an interior design major and we look at different view points from ours to our clients and then we construct but also deconstruct to know problem and solution.
My Question:
I am not a hundred percent sure when she uses the word hampered but the way it is used I am assuming like hound or told many times. I don’t really have any questions towards the author because items or objects to me are unisex no gender bias associated to it. But we as humans associate items or objects or everyday thing to a sex. Which this causes problems of hate but she uses a Niagara falls which if someone saw it they would more or less of think woah cool lots of pictures of it what about it. Well it shows different view points but it also shows it from the view points socially.
Picasso’s 1909 painting ‘‘Femme Assise’’ Seated Woman
Vincent van Gogh, Vincent’s Bedroom In Arles, 1889
Escher, Relativity, 1953
